BGH changes judgments in the case of the fake cancer from Ingolstadt

BGH changes judgments in the case of the fake cancer from Ingolstadt

ineffective against cancer: the social consequences of fraud

The case of a naturopath and a provider of a supposedly Miraculous cancer not only has legal dimensions, but also throws a bright light on the vulnerable people in healthcare. Most recently, the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has slightly modified the judgments in this scandalous fraud in Bavaria. The procedure, which lasted over two years, shaked confidence in alternative healing methods.

Who are the accused?

The accused, a naturopath and a man commissioned by selling the agent, had offered their services from a number of seriously ill patients, including many cancer. In June 2023, they were convicted by the Ingolstadt District Court: the naturopath received a three -year prison sentence, while the provider of the agent was sentenced to six years and nine months in prison. These decisions show that the legal system draws clear limits even in complex health issues.

The meaning of the process

What makes this case particularly tragic is the fact that many victims suffered from serious illnesses and sometimes died before the negotiation. Such fraud cases underline the serious risks that patients are exposed to if they rely on non -approved medication. Trust in the health system is unnecessarily endangered by these incidents, which can have far -reaching consequences for the acceptance of medical treatments.

The long way to justice

With a total of 64 days of negotiations, the procedure in Ingolstadt was the longest process in the history of the court. The BGH found that in two cases the indictment cannot be maintained due to the statute of limitations, which means that the time has expired for legal persecution. In other cases, however, it remains with the existing debt. For the provider of the cancer agent, a new overall hazard penalty must be determined, which shows that the legal system continuously works after the judgment.

conclusion: trust in the test bench

Overall, this case not only shows the responsibility of naturopaths and providers, but also the need to create transparency in alternative medicine. Patients have the right to safe and evidence -based treatments. The legal consequences of this scandal could help improve security standards in the field of alternative medicine and thus to regain the trust of people into medical products.

- Nag