Inheritance dispute: the court rejects the adoptive children's action
Inheritance dispute: the court rejects the adoptive children's action
The inheritance dispute between the adoptive children and the founder of the drugstore chain Müller throws a light on the complex questions of the inheritance law in Germany. The case also illustrates how adoptions can affect inheritance contracts.
Details on the legal dispute
In a recent decision by the Munich Higher Regional Court, the lawsuit was rejected by three adult adoptive children against their adoptive father, the 91-year-old Erwin Müller. However, these had initially waived their compulsory portion at the heir, but later demanded it back, which led to an intensive legal dispute.
waiver of the contract and the legal opinion
The court made it clear that the compulsory portion agreement was legally valid. The plaintiffs had argued that they had not received the contract in time, but this was not recognized by the court. The judges believed that the adoptive children were informed about the legal consequences of their waiver and were able to decide independently.
Missing psychological stress
In addition, the plaintiffs presented that they suffered from psychological stress and financial dependence. The court could not convince these arguments either. This raises questions about the responsibility of adults in terms of inheritance decisions and illuminates the often difficult nature of family relationships.
role of adoption in inheritance issues
The question that arises from this case is to what extent adopted, who do without their rights, can fight for the future legacy of their adoptive father. The case shows that family and legal framework conditions are not always harmoniously coordinated, especially when it comes to financial issues.
Background information on the founder
Erwin Müller, who took his first steps in the industry in 1953, founded the drugstore chain, which today has over 900 branches in Europe and employs around 35,000 people. This considerable business experience could play a role in future inheritance disputes and illustrates the challenges associated with the transfer of family ownership.
future of the legal dispute
The plaintiff's lawyers announced that they want to go to appeal, which shows that the legal arguments about Erb by Erwin Müller are far from over. However, a possible financer for the costs of the appeal is still pending, which could influence the plaintiff's strategy.
This case not only causes legal interest, but also affects fundamental questions about how we consider inheritance in modern society. The outcome of this legal dispute could have far -reaching implications for future cases that raise similar legal questions.
- Nag