Suche
Mein Konto
It's always the others who are difficult
Conflicts in the federal government and what we can learn from them The recent dismissal of Christian Lindner as federal minister has brought the discord within the federal government into focus. Who is responsible? Who made mistakes? Each party points the finger at the other, while constructive solutions often fall by the wayside. This dynamic, in which each side looks for blame on others, is not new - neither in politics nor in everyday life. But conflicts like these also offer valuable lessons for dealing with difficult situations. Recognizing the causes of conflict In political and personal dialogues and conflicts,...
It's always the others who are difficult
Conflicts in the federal government and what we can learn from them
The recent dismissal of Christian Lindner as federal minister has brought the discord within the federal government into focus. Who is responsible?
Who made mistakes? Each party points the finger at the other, while constructive solutions often fall by the wayside.
This dynamic, in which each side looks for blame on others, is not new - neither in politics nor in everyday life. But conflicts like these also offer valuable lessons for dealing with difficult situations.
Identify causes of conflict
A similar pattern often emerges in political and personal dialogues and conflicts:
-Different interests: Coalitions consist of different parties with sometimes opposing goals. Compromises are inevitable – but not always easy.
-Lack of communication: Misunderstandings arise when clear communication is missing or messages are not perceived correctly.
-Apportioning blame: The focus on questions of guilt blocks the path to a solution. Instead, he hardens the fronts.
Finding solutions: communication and body language
As speaker Ute Herzog repeatedly emphasizes, dialogue and body language are key to defusing conflicts and finding solutions. What can the federal government – and all of us – learn from such conflicts?
-Constructive dialogue: Those involved should listen instead of just insisting on their own position. Anyone who pays attention to the other person creates a basis for understanding.
-Open body language: An open look and calm gestures signal willingness to talk. Political actors should consciously avoid aggressive or defensive postures.
-Acceptance instead of blame: Acceptance does not mean accepting mistakes, but rather understanding different perspectives. This is the only way to create viable compromises.
Humor as a conflict resolver
Even when political debates are serious, clever use of humor can ease tensions. Humor creates a common ground and makes it easier to get deadlocked discussions going again. Perhaps a few ironic remarks would have brought some relief in the heated debates about Lindner?
Conclusion: responsibility instead of guilt
Conflicts like those in the federal government show how important it is to take responsibility and look for constructive solutions. Whether in politics, in the office, at a lecture or at home - the question of guilt rarely gets us anywhere. What helps us is the willingness to communicate openly, practice acceptance and sometimes look at things with humor.
Because sometimes the solution lies in looking at yourself first - instead of always lecturing others about your own shortcomings.
Only those who understand people can inspire them.
As an experienced keynote speaker and body language expert, Ute Herzog brings her unique insights and strategies to your organization.
contact
The human reader from Franconia
Ute Herzog
Georg-Strobel-Str. 81
90489 Nuremberg
+491778647545
The image rights belong to the author of the message.